Commentary column by Senior Researcher Izumi Kubota of the Social Systems Field at the National Institute for Environmental Studies on the advisory opinion on state obligations regarding climate change published by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 23, 2025. This advisory opinion is an extremely important view where the ICJ stated that "under international law, states have an obligation to take climate action" and that countries that fail in this obligation bear legal responsibility. Led by Vanuatu with joint proposals from 132 countries and participation from 96 countries and 11 international organizations, it became the largest-scale procedure in history. The ICJ determined that obligations arise not only from climate-related treaties but from all international law including customary international law, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and international human rights law, confirming that the 1.5°C target is an important standard based on scientific evidence under the Paris Agreement. State obligation violations include fossil fuel production, consumption, exploration permits, and subsidy provision, with violations resulting in full compensation obligations. While advisory opinions have no legally binding force, they will significantly influence future climate litigation and international negotiations, signifying the dawn of a new era of climate action based on rule of law.
The Dawn of a New Era of Climate Action Based on Rule of Law - Understanding the ICJ Advisory Opinion
Overview
Commentary column by Senior Researcher Izumi Kubota of the Social Systems Field at the National Institute for Environmental Studies on the advisory opinion on state obligations regarding climate change published by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 23, 2025. This advisory opinion is an extremely important view where the ICJ stated that "under international law, states have an obligation to take climate action" and that countries that fail in this obligation bear legal responsibility. Led by Vanuatu with joint proposals from 132 countries and participation from 96 countries and 11 international organizations, it became the largest-scale procedure in history. The ICJ determined that obligations arise not only from climate-related treaties but from all international law including customary international law, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and international human rights law, confirming that the 1.5°C target is an important standard based on scientific evidence under the Paris Agreement. State obligation violations include fossil fuel production, consumption, exploration permits, and subsidy provision, with violations resulting in full compensation obligations. While advisory opinions have no legally binding force, they will significantly influence future climate litigation and international negotiations, signifying the dawn of a new era of climate action based on rule of law.
Related Articles
2025-08-01 | 国立環境研究所
Interdisciplinary Research Reveals Potential Smuggling of Natural Monument Hermit Crabs from Japan to Taiwan
2025-07-29 | 国立環境研究所
見えない不安に、見える確かさを~NIES環境標準物質の挑戦
2025-07-18 | 国立環境研究所
High-Resolution Prediction Data for Hourly Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), Population Heat Exposure, and Adaptation Costs in Japan